Menu Close

RIAA DMCAs GitHub into nuking popular YouTube video download tool, says it can be used to slurp music

GitHub has hidden from view the source code and downloads of YouTube-DL, a popular open-source tool used for saving YouTube videos to disk, at the request of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).

The DMCA take-down demand, submitted on Friday evening, argues the software can be used to illegally download copyrighted music by artists the RIAA represents. As such, the association pushed for the removal of the app and all forks of it from GitHub.

YouTube-DL is pretty simple to use: you give the command-line program the URL of any YouTube video, and it will fetch the material and save it to your computer for future playback.

The record industry body reckons this application bypasses YouTube’s anti-copying protections, and ultimately allows folks to pirate commercial tracks hosted on YouTube. Record labels and artists these days upload their tracks to the Google-owned giant to effectively stream their work to world-plus-dog amid ad breaks, though they’re not too keen on netizens ripping their own copies of the music.

It reminds us of the whole war decades ago over taping music off the radio, saving to magnetic storage content streamed over the air. Sounds familiar.

“The clear purpose of this source code is to circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use,” the RIAA’s take-down order claimed.

“We ask that you immediately take down and disable access to the youtube-dl source code at all of its locations where it is hosted on GitHub.”

The Microsoft-owned source code warehouse duly complied by disappearing the code from view, noting on the YouTube-DL project page: “This repository is currently disabled due to a DMCA takedown notice. We have disabled public access to the repository.” We note that this affects the website, as its source code and download links point to its GitHub page, which has now vanished from sight.

If you’re wondering whether or not the RIAA is going to just start going after any software – like web browsers or simply get and curl – that can be used to potentially download copyrighted material illegally, the association did note that YouTube-DL’s documentation specifically said the software was useful for fetching tracks by Icona Pop, Justin Timberlake, and Taylor Swift.

“The source code prominently includes as sample uses of the source code the downloading of copies of our members’ copyrighted sound recordings and music videos,” the RIAA stated. “The source code notes that the Icona Pop work identified above is under the YouTube Standard license, which expressly restricts access to copyrighted works only for streaming on YouTube and prohibits their further reproduction or distribution without consent of the copyright owner.

“We have a good faith belief that this activity is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.”

Parker Higgins, a digital-rights activist and advocacy director at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, argued that the reference to the three pop-stars was “sleight of hand,” and “the ‘activity’ that RIAA is claiming is unauthorized is hypothetical.” The RIAA didn’t provide proof of copyright infringement, only a complaint that the software could be used to bypass copy protections.

“Anything that downloads YouTube videos is, per the RIAA, de facto infringing, independent of the intended use or the underlying content,” Higgins said.

“As anyone who has used youtube-dl knows, it is an extremely powerful and useful tool for format-shifting,” he added. “It’s super popular among archivists and has incredibly broad fair use applications. The RIAA stance here is pretty aggressive and out there.”

The EFF said YouTube-DL has “a world of lawful usages,” in a tweet:

YouTube-DL maintainer and core developer Sergey M told The Reg tonight, “No comment at this time, sorry,” when we asked if the app’s team planned to contest the take-down or move it to another code-hosting website.

Read Original Article…